Quantcast College Times
College Media Network

Congress supports $16 billion aid plan for Amtrak, passenger rail projects

June 12, 2008

Herb Jackson - The Record (Hackensack N.J.)
Issue date: 6/12/08 Section: Real News
  • Print
  • Email
One of them is the nearly 100-year-old Portal Bridge, which carries trains over the Hackensack River between Kearny, N.J., and Secaucus, N.J. The bridge has become a bottleneck, requiring lower speed limits and stoppages when the bridge swings open to let ships pass. In July 2006, NJ Transit had to cancel 22 trains when the bridge became stuck open at the start of an afternoon rush hour.

Bush has repeatedly tried to eliminate federal subsidies for Amtrak and advocated privatizing Northeast Corridor service. The House bill would allow private companies to bid to provide a new high-speed service that could take riders between New York and Washington in two hours, but opponents of privatization said it was unlikely such a proposal would be viable.

On Monday, the White House said Bush would veto the bill because it "authorizes an unprecedented level of funding but does not include basic measures to hold Amtrak accountable to taxpayers for its spending decisions."

The White House noted that the Senate version of the bill approved in October, sponsored by New Jersey Democrat Frank Lautenberg, included requirements that Amtrak implement management reforms to receive promised funding. That bill passed by a veto-proof margin of 70-22, and Lautenberg reacted angrily to the veto threat.

"It is absolutely outrageous that President Bush would continue his hostility to energy-efficient rail service in our country," Lautenberg said. "President Bush needs to wake up and realize people are sick and tired of paying too much for gas, sitting in traffic and being delayed on airline flights."

The last long-term funding bill supporting Amtrak was passed 11 years ago and expired in 2002. Since then, Amtrak has survived on year-to-year appropriations.

The total price tag for the House bill, $16.4 billion, is higher than the $12 billion in Lautenberg's bill. The two bills would have to be meshed by a conference committee, and then both houses would have to vote again.

The bill would provide an average of $840 million a year through 2013 for capital programs, up from $565 million this year. It also provides an average $606 million a year for operating expenses, up from $475 million this year. The House approved an amendment adding $1.5 billion over five years for the Washington-area subway and bus system.
< prev Page 2 of 2

Article Tools

More from Real News


Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Does Jay Leno's new show suck?

Submit Vote

View Results



Advertisement







Advertisement